The sites I visited included flickr, photobucket, deviantart, kodak easy share gallery, smugmug, snapfish, phanfare, atpic, webshots, zooomr, woophy, and picasa. I learned that photosharing sites originated in the mid to late 1990’s-arising mostly from services providing online ordering of prints. I learned that some sites are free, while others charge consumers to host and share photos. I learned that captions or “tags” can be added to photos and that photos can be edited and enhanced (as in snapfish). I learned that photos can be organized according to taxonomy-a directory like or gallery structure organized by topic (example mountains) or “folksonomy” (another addition to my technical dictionary!)-where the organization depends on the people in the pictures. I found that some sites include drawings or paintings as well as photos and I sometimes found it hard to differentiate between photo and drawing (check this out). I found the quality and size of photos varied (I liked flickr’s and smugmug’s), but was annoyed by the ads that accompanied some sites especially the webshots, which offered me a congratulatory free laptop for checking in with them (I passed on the offer). I liked sites that provided links to the artist’s page so that you could see the artist’s gallery (like photobucket and deviantart). This is often the way that I choose reading material-if I like a book by a certain author, I’ll often trust that other books that he or she has written will also be ones that I’ll like. I liked the video component of photobucket’s site. I found that you could buy almost anything-cards, frames, mugs, aprons, neckties, blankets, coasters-with a photo of your choice on it from kodak easy share gallery. I liked the way woophy set up its site with the map of the world. This would be a great way for my third grade social studies students to cue into photo information about Peru, India, Ukraine, and Tunisia: our countries under study. I loved the photo titled “they’re not going to be happy about this down at the henhouse” from zooomr-it would be a great photo to use in our oology unit (oology is the study of eggs. We add this unit as an elective to our grade three science program).
The issue of “virtual theft”-stealing someone else’s art-is one that becomes almost immediately apparent. Joyce Valenza writes about copyright/copyleft/fair use in her blog. She directs us to a good starting point for educating students about copyright with a link to Sharing Creative Works-an illustrated primer by Roberts, Royer and Phillips.
I think these photosharing sites could be useful at any grade level depending on the comfort level teachers have with technology. For proof that even young children can engage constructively in technology view a grade one class’s video.
Our school Christmas concert coordinators are often ringing their hands over concert backdrops. As I wandered around the photos, I couldn’t help but think that if they could be project onto screens for backdrops, it would be awesome. I also thought the art on these sites would make great story starters for creative writing and could be included to enhance and illustrate student writing.
I also think that visiting these sites promotes collaboration-even making comments on the entries does this and that providing opportunities to use these sites contributes to a spacial intelligence of Gardner’s MI theories.
On a personal level, I can see the utility of using a photosharing site to keep in contact with my friends and family. I can also see it would be a great way to journal-both professionally (following FOIP standards, of course), and personally especially on travels.
I look forward to further exploration and virtual travels(!) of photosharing sites.
The issue of “virtual theft”-stealing someone else’s art-is one that becomes almost immediately apparent. Joyce Valenza writes about copyright/copyleft/fair use in her blog. She directs us to a good starting point for educating students about copyright with a link to Sharing Creative Works-an illustrated primer by Roberts, Royer and Phillips.
I think these photosharing sites could be useful at any grade level depending on the comfort level teachers have with technology. For proof that even young children can engage constructively in technology view a grade one class’s video.
Our school Christmas concert coordinators are often ringing their hands over concert backdrops. As I wandered around the photos, I couldn’t help but think that if they could be project onto screens for backdrops, it would be awesome. I also thought the art on these sites would make great story starters for creative writing and could be included to enhance and illustrate student writing.
I also think that visiting these sites promotes collaboration-even making comments on the entries does this and that providing opportunities to use these sites contributes to a spacial intelligence of Gardner’s MI theories.
On a personal level, I can see the utility of using a photosharing site to keep in contact with my friends and family. I can also see it would be a great way to journal-both professionally (following FOIP standards, of course), and personally especially on travels.
I look forward to further exploration and virtual travels(!) of photosharing sites.